Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an eosinophil-rich, Th2 antigen-mediated disease of increasing worldwide prevalence. Originally considered common in children and young adults, it can be seen at any age, with the highest prevalence between 30 and 40 years. Symptoms reflect esophageal dysfunction, and typical endoscopic pictures consist of rings, furrows, exudates and edema. Progressive disease leads to pathologic tissue remodeling, with ensuing esophageal rigidity and loss of luminal diameter caused by strictures. The definitive diagnosis is histological (at least 15 eosinophils/HPF, high power field), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple esophageal biopsies being mandatory. Current therapeutic options include dietary and pharmacologic treatments. Despite being successful in a high proportion of patients, elemental diet has multiple disadvantages. Therefore, a step-up approach (using a two-, four- and six food elimination diets) is preferred, being globally effective in up to 79% of cases and avoiding unnecessary restrictions. Drug therapy relies on proton pump inhibitors and topical corticosteroids. Esophageal dilation may be required to increase luminal patency, leading to immediate symptomatic improvement in 95% of EoE patients, who have strictures or narrow caliber esophagus. The chronic nature of the disease necessitates long-term therapy. In this review, current diagnostic and treatment options are discussed and a treatment algorithm is proposed.BACKGROUND AND AIMS Hemospray is a non-contact modality of endoscopic hemostasis that has been used in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) with varying success. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of Hemospray in the management of UGIB. METHODS An electronic bibliographic search of digital dissertation databases was performed from inception till October 2019. All prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of Hemospray in the management of UGIB were analysed. The primary outcome was immediate haemostasis and the secondary outcome was rebleeding rate. Subgroup analyses based on etiology of UGIB (tumour-related, variceal, etc) were also performed. RESULTS A total of 11 prospective studies, including 4 randomized trials were included for the analysis. The pooled immediate haemostasis rate with Hemospray was 93% (95% CI 90.3-95%, p less then 0.001). Rebleeding occurred in 14.4% (95% CI 8.8-22.8%, p less then 0.001) of patients. For the subgroup of tumour-related bleeding, the immediate haemostasis rate was 95.3% (95% CI 89.6-97.3%; p less then 0.001) and rebleeding rate was 21.9% (95% CI 13.9-32.7%, p less then 0.001). In patients with variceal bleeding, immediate haemostasis was achieved in 92.7% (95% CI 83.6-96.9%; p less then 0.001) of patients, with a rebleeding rate of 3.1% (95% CI 0.9-10.2%, p less then 0.001). CONCLUSION Hemospray shows high immediate haemostasis and low bleeding percentages. The odds were in its favour compared to conventional endoscopic modalities, but not statistically significant. The results are undermined by the risk of bias in the studies. Nevertheless, it is an easy technique that should be further investigated with better studies.BACKGROUND AND AIMS The development of an esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) is associated with poor prognosis. We observed a high rate of vocal fold paralysis (VFP) in patients with ERF. Data on prevalence and complications of VFP in ERF are lacking. The present study investigated the incidence of VFP in patients with malignant ERF and examined possible risk factors and the impact on survival. METHODS We performed a retrospective case-control study of 46 institutional cases of EC patients with ERF in a time period of eleven years. Patients were matched to 92 randomly selected controls (EC patients without ERF) in a 12 fashion for tumor localization and histology. Demographics, clinical characteristics, recurrence, treatment modalities as well as survival were analyzed. RESULTS Esophageal cancer patients with ERF developed more often VFP than EC patients without ERF (59% vs. 21%; p=0.02; odds ratio (OR) 4.9). Esophageal cancer patients with ERF had a more pronounced weight loss (7.1 vs. 11.5 kg; P = 0.008), as well as higher rates of esophageal (p= less then 0.001; OR 22.9) and tracheal stenting (p= less then 0.001; OR 76.8). Proximal tumor growth (p=0.004; OR 7.9), fistula formation to the trachea (p= less then 0.001; OR 17.2) and recurrent disease (p=0.04, OR 4.7) was associated with VFP development in EC patients with ERF. Vocal fold paralysis in ERF did not adversely affect five-year survival. CONCLUSIONS Vocal fold paralysis is a common complication in more than half of the patients with ERF in EC. It is associated with proximal tumor growth, fistula formation to the trachea and disease recurrence, but does not influence survival.BACKGROUND AND AIMS The development of an esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) is associated with poor prognosis. We observed a high rate of vocal fold paralysis (VFP) in patients with ERF. Data on prevalence and complications of VFP in ERF are lacking. The present study investigated the incidence of VFP in patients with malignant ERF and examined possible risk factors and the impact on survival. METHODS We performed a retrospective case-control study of 46 institutional cases of EC patients with ERF in a time period of eleven years. Patients were matched to 92 randomly selected controls (EC patients without ERF) in a 12 fashion for tumor localization and histology. Demographics, clinical characteristics, recurrence, treatment modalities as well as survival were analyzed. RESULTS Esophageal cancer patients with ERF developed more often VFP than EC patients without ERF (59% vs. 21%; p=0.02; odds ratio (OR) 4.9). Esophageal cancer patients with ERF had a more pronounced weight loss (7.1 vs. 11.5 kg; P = 0.008), as well as higher rates of esophageal (p= less then 0.001; OR 22.9) and tracheal stenting (p= less then 0.001; OR 76.8). Proximal tumor growth (p=0.004; OR 7.9), fistula formation to the trachea (p= less then 0.001; OR 17.2) and recurrent disease (p=0.04, OR 4.7) was associated with VFP development in EC patients with ERF. Vocal fold paralysis in ERF did not adversely affect five-year survival. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate-ammoniumammonium.html CONCLUSIONS Vocal fold paralysis is a common complication in more than half of the patients with ERF in EC. It is associated with proximal tumor growth, fistula formation to the trachea and disease recurrence, but does not influence survival.